Donate Now!

Donate Now!
Buy a membership or koozies to help!

Monday, November 19, 2007

Get this man's aide some glasses.

Recently I sent a letter off to my Senators about NAIS. This isn't my first time, so I expected a "canned" response. oh, boy did I get one;

Dear Mrs. Phelan:


Thank you for contacting me regarding the Farm Bill. I appreciate your taking the time to share your thoughts with me.


In late October the Senate Agriculture Committee passed S. 2302, the Food and Energy Security Act of 2007. Two weeks later the Senate began debate on the floor with a goal to work through amendments and hopefully pass a Farm Bill. Unfortunately, procedural maneuvers on the part of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) have prevented members on both sides of the aisle from offering amendments. As a result, the Senate has yet to complete its work on the Farm Bill.


These delays prohibit the Senate from passing a Farm Bill in a timely fashion, which makes financial and planting decisions difficult for our nation's farmers and ranchers. Kansas wheat farmers already planted next year's crop without knowing what a new Farm Bill will look like. I am hopeful producers and their lenders will not face a similar situation this spring. The Senate needs to have an open and honest debate and quickly complete a Farm Bill. I plan to work with my colleagues to continue to protect the programs that work for Kansans and find a way to move forward.


Sincerely,
Pat



Now let's compare that to the first letter I got, shall we?



Dear Mrs. Phelan
Thanks for your comment regarding a national animal identification system. I appreciate your taking the time to write on this important topic.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have taken steps to prevent the spread of animal borne diseases. Among the initiatives announced by Secretary of Agriculture is the establishment of a national animal identification system (NAIS) The system is constructed of three parts: registering the premises within the state, identification for groups of animals in a lot, and animal tracking. The purpose of this regulation is to track animals facing contagious disease back to their original herd. This allows the USDA to minimize the effect quickly and quarantine the animal. USDA officials have indicated that the system is currently voluntary, but will be mandatory in the future.

The USDA recognizes that it may not be feasible or cost effective for a producer to identify each animal. Therefore, current guidelines allow for group/lot identification for both large- and small- scale producers, whose animals move as a group through the production chain. In addition, the USDA does not recommend or endorse any particular method of identification, such as microchip, leg band or ear tag. Instead, the USDA will defer to producers to decide which method of identification is the best and most cost efficient for their animals.

I have long states that any national animal identification program should be based upon he recommendations of producers and not a top-down mandate issued by the Congress of some federal agency. The Current NAIS voluntary participation period is aimed at cooperatively developing the most efficient system possible. To this end, the USDA is soliciting comments and suggestions from producers. Additionally, the Senate Agriculture Committee has held several oversight hearings on animal identification issues.

Again, thank you for writing. You may rest assured, I will keep your comment handy as the committee continues oversight on this important issue.

If you would like more information on issues before the Senate, please visit my website at http://robert.senate.gov You may also sign up on my home page for a monthly electronic newsletter that will provide additional update on my work for Kansas.

With every best wish,
Sincerely,
Pat





hhmmmm...Why did the latest letter not mention NAIS? Why are we passing blame onto others? My letter talked about NAIS, not the...wait what are we calling it now? The Food and Energy Security act of 2007. What!?! This is not a Farm bill, this is corporate and fear monger sponsorship. oops did I say that out loud?



Pat Roberts, Senator for Kansas and his aide that sent the letter, both of you need to take a time out in the corner and think about what you have done.

6 comments:

Henwhisperer said...

Just want to give you a shout out from another anti-NAIS activist. These Congresscritters are out in left field, aren't they?

Well, carry on. Keep fighting the good fight.

Henwhisperer

Celeste said...

I doubt the buzzards would like that meat.

Phelan said...

henwhisperer, thank you for stopping by. And I will try my best.

Celeste, I have some yucky visions of what a buzzard wouldn't eat.

Robbyn said...

Again, politics makes no sense to me. This is like a teenager avoiding an issue by changing the subject entirely (Now THAT I'm used to! lol)

I wonder if any part of the real NAIS concerns are getting through to any of our politicians.

Phelan said...

Robbyn, my sidebar list of NAIS now has an article by Ron Paul. Go, read, be merry. Someone is listening to us.

sexy said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,a片,情趣用品

免費A片,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛

情色文學,色情A片,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,言情小說,愛情小說,AV片,A漫,AVDVD,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,成人交友,成人電影,成人貼圖,成人小說,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人遊戲,愛情公寓,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色小說,成人論壇

美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,視訊,免費視訊,美女交友,成人交友,聊天室交友,微風論壇,微風成人,情色貼圖,色情,微風,聊天室尋夢園,交友,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊辣妹,一夜情

A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...